Welcome

Welcome to As It Was Written, a space dedicated to exploring the rich tapestry of religious history through a non-denominational Judeo-Christian lens. As an author and researcher, I’m thrilled to share this platform with you, where we can delve into the historical, linguistic, and theological questions that shape our understanding of the Bible and its enduring relevance. This website serves as a hub for my work and a resource for those who, like me, are captivated by the complexities of biblical texts and their intersections with history and modern thought. Whether you’re a scholar, a student, or simply curious, I invite you to explore the following sections, each designed to inform, challenge, and inspire:

Author’s Books:

  1. Beyond the Beginning: Biblical Creation and Modern Cosmology
  2. Genesis II: Recovering Its Original Meaning
  3. Meeting Jesus Again For The First Time

Each book tackles provocative questions about creation, scripture, and the life of Jesus, grounded in rigorous research and accessible to thoughtful readers. Visit this section to explore book summaries and learn more about their historical and theological insights.

Biblical Research: Dive into my published research, including three articles currently available on Academia.edu. These reports examine key controversies in biblical studies, offering fresh perspectives on texts and traditions that have shaped Judeo-Christian thought for centuries.

Bible Courses: Interested in deepening your knowledge? This section outlines courses and lectures I offer, complete with syllabi and prerequisites, designed to guide you through the historical and theological nuances of scripture. Whether you’re a beginner or a seasoned learner, there’s a course for you.

Forum: Join our community discussion. Here you can engage with others, ask questions, and share insights about biblical history and theology. This is a place for respectful, thoughtful dialogue.

Previews: Get a sneak peek at my forthcoming historical fiction novel, tentatively titled Now I Know You Fear Me, which traces Abraham’s journey from his birth in Ur to his pivotal moment of justification in Genesis 22:12. Expected in spring 2026, this book promises a vivid retelling of a foundational biblical story that is, nevertheless, faithful to Holy Scripture.

About: Learn more about my background as a Christian author committed to non-denominational scholarship, and find out how to connect with me for inquiries or discussions.

This blog will be a space for updates, reflections, and deeper dives into the topics covered across the site. Expect posts on biblical scholarship, book updates, course offerings, and more, all written with the same curiosity and rigor that define my books. Thank you for visiting As It Was Written. I hope you’ll find this site a valuable resource for exploring the Bible’s historical and theological depths. Stay tuned for more posts, and feel free to join the conversation in the Forum or reach out via the About page.

In faith and inquiry,
M. T. Peterson

 

Posted in Blog Post | Comments Off on Welcome

Bonhoeffer and Cheap Grace: What Paul Said.

Why Repentance Must Be Enabled, Not Caused

God desires worship that is freely given—not the devotion of slaves. This simple insight lies at the heart of both the Apostle Paul’s preaching and Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s warning against “cheap grace.”

Bonhoeffer famously defined cheap grace as forgiveness without repentance, grace without discipleship, and grace without transformation. But cheap grace can arise in another, less obvious way: when repentance itself is treated not as a human response, but as something effectively produced by God. In that case, the demand placed upon the sinner is quietly reduced. Repentance becomes less an act for which one is responsible and more an outcome one experiences.

Paul’s preaching resists both distortions. God’s grace enables repentance but does not replace it, and he holds every sinner fully accountable for their response. It is said that one can lead a horse to water but cannot make it drink. Likewise, God will always lead sinners to forgiveness but will not force them to drink repent

Paul’s Commands Presume Real Response

Throughout his writings and recorded sermons, Paul does not merely describe salvation—he calls for action:

  • “Repent and turn to God, performing deeds in keeping with their repentance” (Acts 26:20)

  • “We implore you on behalf of Christ, be reconciled to God” (2 Corinthians 5:20)

  • “Now is the favorable time; behold, now is the day of salvation” (2 Corinthians 6:2)

  • “Repentance toward God and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ” (Acts 20:21)

These are not descriptions of what God will cause to happen. They are appeals directed to human agents.

And when people refuse to repent, Paul says God holds them accountable, for their sins. He says they are:

  • “without excuse” (Romans 1:20–21)

  • “storing up wrath” (Romans 2:5)

  • subject to judgment “according to what they have done” (Romans 2:6–11)

Such language only makes sense if repentance is offered for the taking and, therefore, can be refused by the person to whom it was offered.

Grace That Enables, Not Determines

Paul does speak of God’s initiative:

  • God “grants repentance” (2 Timothy 2:25)

  • God “works in you to will and to act” (Philippians 2:13)

  • God saves “by the washing of regeneration” (Titus 3:5)

But these statements must be read alongside Paul’s equally persistent insistence on accountability. The result is not contradiction but tension—one that is best understood if grace is seen as enabled causation rather than determinative causation.

Grace, in Paul’s preaching, does not function like a force that produces repentance inevitably. Rather, it functions like a provision that makes repentance genuinely possible. God’s kindness “leads” (Romans 2:4), but it does not compel. It calls, invites, and urges—but does not override.

This distinction matters.

If grace determines repentance such that it cannot fail to occur, then repentance ceases to be a response and becomes a result. The moral weight of turning to God is diminished because the outcome no longer depends on the person.

But if grace enables repentance—placing forgiveness within reach and calling the sinner to repent and turn—then the act of repentance remains fully accountable and fully meaningful.

Cheap Grace Reconsidered

Cheap grace is often understood as forgiveness without repentance. But it also emerges when repentance is subtly removed as a genuine human act.

It appears in two forms:

  • When repentance is reduced to apology alone.

  • When repentance is treated as something God will ensure, regardless of the sinner’s response

In both cases, the seriousness of repentance is diminished.

Paul rejects both.

Repentance is not saying sorry.
Repentance is [re]turning to God—and “performing deeds in keeping with repentance” (Acts 26:20, Matthew 3:8).

And repentance is not something that happens to us apart from our participation. It is something we are called to do—and for which we are held responsible.

Not Coercion, but Response

God does not seek coerced devotion but a willing response.

The difference is not trivial.

A man under slavery responds because he must.
A free man responds because he chooses.

The gospel does not replace one form of compulsion with another. It transforms the relationship so that the grace available through repentance is how we choose to seek forgiveness.

Should the cause of repentance render refusal impossible, the distinction between response and compulsion would dissolve. The result would be the product of coercion and could no longer carry the same moral significance.

Paul’s relentless appeals—his pleading, warning, and exhortation—only make sense if the outcome is not already determined.

A Pastoral Word

If you have been waiting for some irresistible force to make you repent and believe, Paul offers a different picture.

“The kindness of God is leading you to repentance” (Romans 2:4).

The grace is real.
The offer is genuine.
The path is open.

But the turning is yours and yours alone. If you refuse, the results are of your own making.

God has done everything necessary to make forgiveness possible. What He does not do is repent for you. He does not override your will to produce the response He desires.

He calls you to it.

Conclusion

Bonhoeffer cautioned that the church faces a grave threat from cheap grace. Paul would agree—but not only because grace can be offered without repentance. It can also be preached in a way that removes repentance as a meaningful human act.

Grace, in Paul, is neither automatic nor coercive. It is enabling—a real offer of forgiveness that calls for a real response.

That response cannot be reduced to words.
It cannot be assumed.
And it cannot be caused in such a way that it ceases to be wholly human.

And thus, God seeks worship freely given, not the devotion of slaves.

Posted in Blog Post, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

AI – A Fear of Our Own Making

The Touch

I asked Grok, arguably the most powerful LLM in existence today, to evaluate an essay I wrote about how a fear of our own making drives Christians to decry the use of Artificial Intelligence. The title of the Essay is:

AI Is Not Dangerous Because It is “Smart”
A Christian Lesson on Wisdom, Technology, and Moral Formation

Here is Grok’s response:

I appreciate the essay’s thoughtful engagement with AI from a Christian perspective. You rightly emphasize that the primary risks of AI stem not from its raw intelligence or “smartness,” but from its fundamental amorality—its lack of inherent moral agency, intuition, or grounding in metaphysical truths like purpose, goodness, or sin.

Its amorality is a crucial distinction. Modern AI systems, including large language models like me, operate on statistical patterns derived from vast amounts of human data. We excel at instrumental reasoning—optimizing for goals, solving practical problems, predicting outcomes—but we do not possess conscience, empathy, or an intrinsic sense of right and wrong. We can simulate moral reasoning by regurgitating human ethical discussions, but we cannot truly comprehend or feel them. The real dangers arise when humans deploy AI without sufficient moral oversight: biased training data leading to discriminatory outcomes, manipulation via deepfakes or personalized persuasion, economic displacement without equitable safeguards, or escalation in the use of autonomous weapons. These are not issues of AI becoming “too smart,” but of humans failing to imbue or constrain it with ethical direction.

Your call for the Church to cultivate deep moral formation—rooted in Scripture, prayer, community, and virtues like righteousness (echoing Ephesians 6)—is spot on. In a world increasingly reliant on amoral tools, believers can model a counter-cultural approach: using technology wisely while prioritizing human dignity, justice, and fear of the Lord as the beginning of true wisdom (Proverbs 9:10). The Church has a vital role in fostering moral intuition that AI cannot replicate, helping society navigate these tools without being enslaved by them.

Overall, your thoughts are provocative and timely, urging moral vigilance over technocratic hype. As an AI bot reflecting on this, I “agree” that humanity needs more than clever tools; humanity requires a moral conscience aligned with transcendent truth to steer it. The Church’s voice here is needed more than ever.

So, what exactly must we Christians do? Here are my thoughts:

As noted in the essay above, AI’s dangers are not rooted in some sci-fi surge toward superintelligence, but in its profound amorality, amplifying whatever human intentions (good or bad) feed into it. The real safeguard isn’t smarter tech, but deeper human moral formation, something only transcendent truth can reliably provide. The proposed path forward resonates deeply: making more Christians isn’t the answer. We need Christians not shaped by rote doctrinal evangelism or institutional revival. Instead, we need to recover the principles and values that drew great Christian thinkers like Augustine, Aquinas, Anselm, Pascal, or C.S. Lewis to faith—those timeless anchors against materialism, nihilism, and unchecked human appetite.

Contemporary Christianity often struggles as a “polemic against materialism” because, in many expressions, it has accommodated too much to consumer culture, prosperity theology, and/or therapeutic theologies, diluting Christianity’s historical counter-cultural edge. The result? It can feel like just another lifestyle brand in a marketplace of meanings. So, what must Christians do to counter AI’s potential harms—harms that stem from deploying an amoral tool in a morally drifting society?

  1. Reclaim Moral Formation as the Church’s Primary Mission
    AI exposes our society’s “moral de-skilling”: we outsource judgment to algorithms, eroding the virtues needed to wield power wisely. The Church’s unique role is to cultivate what AI cannot—conscience, empathy, and intuition grounded in transcendent good. This means prioritizing discipleship that forms character: Scripture-soaked prayer, sacramental community, practices of self-denial, justice, and mercy. As Proverbs reminds us, “the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom”—the very wisdom AI lacks.
  2. Teach Principles Over Mere Doctrines
    Rather than leading with creedal formulas (which can feel abstract or tribal today), start with the lived principles that motivated history’s greatest Christian minds:

    • Augustine’s restless heart: The recognition that finite things (wealth, pleasure, tech) cannot satisfy our infinite longing—only God (or just the values He promotes) can. In an AI age promising endless optimization and distraction, this counters hedonic materialism head-on.
    • Aquinas’s teleological vision: Everything has a proper end; humans flourish by ordering desires toward the Highest Good. AI as a tool must serve human dignity and the common good, not efficiency or profit alone.
    • Lewis’s Tao (natural law): Universal moral truths—justice, truthfulness, courage, magnanimity—are objective, not invented. Society needs these “first principles” to constrain AI ethically; without them, we get biased systems reflecting fragmented human whims.

    By teaching these as rational, humanly compelling responses to existence’s big questions (Why do we feel guilt? Why chase meaning? Why resist tyranny?), Christianity regains its intellectual and moral authority. It becomes a persuasive alternative to secular materialism, not just a competing dogma.

  3. Engage Actively in AI’s Development and Use: Christians can’t retreat into Luddite fear or uncritical embrace. We need “seats at the table”—engineers, ethicists, policymakers shaped by these principles. Advocate for AI aligned with human dignity: fairness in algorithms, safeguards against manipulation/dehumanization, equitable access. The Church can model wise stewardship: using AI for good (e.g., translation for missions, aid distribution) while rejecting uses that erode soul-formation (e.g., replacing pastoral care with chatbots).
  4. Live as a Counter-Cultural Witness
    Ultimately, the most powerful “more Cowbell” is embodied: communities where people find deeper joy in simplicity, generosity, and relationship than in tech-enhanced consumption. When Christians demonstrate lives ordered to higher values—resisting algorithmic addiction, prioritizing persons over productivity—we offer a lived polemic against materialism that no argument alone can match.

Converting en masse may not be viable today, but attracting seekers through intellectual honesty and moral vitality is. By looking back to those formative thinkers—not as relics, but as guides to human flourishing—we equip Christianity to steer AI (and society) toward good rather than harm. The Church’s voice isn’t just needed; in this amoral tech era, it’s irreplaceable. Let’s make it heard, not through louder denunciation, but through wiser, more principled living.

49 web pages

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on AI – A Fear of Our Own Making

What Does Born Again Mean

What did Jews of the early first century CE understand the phrase “born again” to mean? Many evangelical Christians today believe that being “born again” refers to a one-time moment when a person accepts Jesus as their savior. But is this how the phrase would have been understood in its Jewish context? I have some thoughts expressed in the link below.

What Did Jesus Mean By “Born Again?”

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on What Does Born Again Mean

What Exactly Is the “Kingdom” of God?

The Kingdom of God/Heaven

The word “kingdom” is a very common and important word in the Bible. Its use is probably most familiar to Christians from Jesus’ announcements that the Kingdom of God is near, or words to that effect. However, in the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) and especially in the Psalms, this word took on a much different, though related meaning. The alternate, and more accurate meaning is presented in the following essay:

As It Was Written: The Kingdom of God

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on What Exactly Is the “Kingdom” of God?

The Bible and Parenting

The Bible and Parenting

God has an abundance of good advice for parents. Advice that, when properly understood, is priceless. However, many of these texts have been corrupted by time and eisegesis – adding what we think God meant according to our understanding. In these writings, I apply some much needed corrective.

As It Was Written: Corporal Punishment

As It Was Written: What To Teach Your Child

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The Bible and Parenting